Showing posts with label Republicans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Republicans. Show all posts

Saturday, May 26, 2007

HaikuReporter Spotlight


Republican has /
Open Government Act blocked /
by a secret hold.

Okay... this is totally fricking batshit insane. Tinfoil-hat wearing, devil-made-me-microwave-the-baby insane. The Open Government Act, which was a bipartisan effort to allow the American Public better access to information by making the government more accountable, was put on hold by a lone Republican Senator.

But we can't find out who.

And we also don't get to know why.

(Cue the Alanis Morissete song.)

Apparently, someone thinks we're not able to digest raw truth and should simply continue eating what Papa George spoon-feeds us. I'm curious to see how the right-wing talking heads try to spin this one.

Wednesday, May 09, 2007

It'll be better in September, I promise!

With all the GOP talk about giving the troop surge in Iraq until september to produce positive results or else face republicans breaking camp, I realized something:

Isn't there an anniversary or something in September that the administration can wave in the public's face to paint any opposition to the troop surge as a danger to Americans at home?

I don't know about the rest of you, but I've seen enough movies to know you don't chase the wounded enemy into an alley or ravine unless you want to fall victim to an ambush.

Friday, November 17, 2006

Lest we forget...

Trent Lott, the new Senate Minority Whip, resigned his leadership position in 2002 for statements endorsing the pro-segregationist policies of the late SC senator Strom Thurmond:
When Strom Thurmond ran for president [in 1948], we voted for him. We're proud of it. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn't have had all these problems over all these years.

In case you were wondering, this was Strom's lead that Lott says we should have followed:
"And I want to tell you, ladies and gentlemen, that there's not enough troops in the Army to force the Southern people to break down segregation and admit the nigra race into our theatres, into our swimming pools, into our homes and into our churches."

"All the laws of Washington and all the bayonets of the Army cannot force the nigra into our homes, our schools, our churches."
(1948 Speech)

Here are some more choice tidbits about our new Senate Minority Whip:

  • In 1982, Lott voted against the extension of the Voting Rights Act, which authorizes the Justice Department to review election law changes in Mississippi and other Deep South states and to monitor elections.
  • In 1983, he was one of 90 House members who voted against creating a national holiday to honor Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
  • Six years later, Lott was one of seven senators who voted to abolish the King holiday commission, and in 1994, he was one of 28 who favored scrapping its federal funding.
  • Lott was one of 34 senators who voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1990, which reversed five Supreme Court rulings that had limited the ability of minorities to win job discrimination lawsuits and damages. After President George H. W. Bush vetoed the bill, Lott voted for a different version in 1991.
  • And in 2001, Lott was the only senator who opposed President George W. Bush's nomination of Roger Gregory, an African-American from Virginia, to the Fourth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
  • In 1999, when Lott was embroiled in another racial controversy, he had only one African-American worker, a mail clerk, out of a staff of 65.
  • In 1981, Lott filed a brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit seeking to overturn an IRS decision to deny a tax exemption to Bob Jones University because of the school's ban on interracial dating.
  • In 1995, Lott criticized Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) for intervening with 39 other lawmakers to get the FBI to release documents in the 1966 death of civil rights activist Vernon Dahmer to Forrest County prosecutors.
  • In 1999, it was reported that Lott had spoken to and met with the segregationist Council of Concerned Citizens on a few occasions. Lott then condemned the group.
  • Last year, Lott and the other white members of the Mississippi congressional delegation refused an entreaty from former Netscape president James Barksdale to declare that they would vote in favor of a statewide referendum to remove the Confederate emblem from the state flag. The proposal lost.

This is who the Republicans picked as their face in their effort to re-energize their base. Like John McCain said:

We lost our principles and our majority. And there is no way to recover our majority without recovering our principles first."

I have to say: good job on recovering the Republican principle of blind hate. That is, after all, what most of your die-hard constituents count on you for: keeping the nigras, fags, and mexicans in their place. You just got too preoccupied with war profiteering to remember that.

Why am I writing about this? Because you sure as hell won't hear about it on TV. It seems that Sen. Lott is getting a whitewash about his white supremacy. Here's bowtie-sporting boob Tucker Carlson's hard-hitting expose:

In the meantime, guess what? Another Republican is making a huge comeback. Remember Senator Trent Lott? Yeah, well, he used to be the majority leader, and then he ran into a little difficulty, but now, he's making a comeback. He is putting his name out there against Lamar Alexander of Tennessee for the minority whip position. Now, some are very surprised by the fact that he's trying to make this sort of a comeback. But it looks like he may, in fact, have enough votes to overtake Alexander for this position.
Way to go, Tucker! Hard as nails, that guy...
So yeah, if people like me don't raise the issue, you'll never hear about it.

Wednesday, November 08, 2006

Ding dong! the witch is dead (or gravely wounded, at least)

The Dems take the house, the majority of governorships, the senate once Virginia calls it - AND Rumsfeld steps down? Holy fucking shit! I'd type more, but I'm too busy doing cartwheels.

And thus the light at the end of the tunnel appears...

Monday, November 06, 2006

Yet ANOTHER dirty trick...

Republicans obviously don't want voters to vote their conscience or vote the issues - after all, they want to win. Hence the following scheme: setting up automated calls to voters, especially those on the 'do not call' list, and having them begin as follows:
Hi, I have an important message from [Democratic Candidate name here]

Obviously, most people hang up as soon as they hear that, with a bitter taste in their mouths over the Democratic candidate. If they kept listening they would have heard an attack on the Democratic candidate's positions. To make matters worse, they set these automated calls up to repeatedly call in order to further irritate voters.

Just what we've come to expect from the party of honesty and values, huh?

Wednesday, November 01, 2006

Taking the military back...

I found this extremely interesting: Out of the dozen Iraq War veterans currently running for Congress, a whopping TEN are running as Democrats (that means only two Iraq veterans are running as Republicans, for those of you who are math-impaired). Wow. That means five times as many veteran candidates are aligned with the Democratic Party than the Republican Party.

But how can this be? The Republicans claim to be the party that represents the military - after all, who coined the phrase "defeatocrat"? Who's been advocating that we should "stay the course" and not "cut and run"? What are these veterans thinking? Here are my three guesses for the Democrat's lead in veteran candidates:
  1. The situation in Iraq is so doomed to failure that out of all the Iraq veterans in a position to run for public office, those who are Democrats feel the need to speak out against the Bush Administrations handling of the war, while most Republican-leaning vets are having a hard time trumpeting the mantra of "stay the course"
  2. Most modern Republicans who'd ever be in a position to run for office would never actually serve in the military to begin with.
Just remember that ratio: 5 to 1. Think about that the next time the Republicans, a party led by:
  • A President who only served 4 years out of 6 in the Texas air national guard
  • A Vice-President who received several draft deferments to avoid Vietnam
  • A speaker of the House, a Senate Majority leader, a House Majority Whip and a Senate Majority Whip who DID NOT SERVE IN THE MILITARY
a party that forced a resolution through the house budget committee to take $844 million out of funding for veterans' medical care, try to wrap themselves in the flag and claim that voting FOR Democrats is voting AGAINST the military.